The Art of War [Baron Antoine-Henri De Jomini] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Antoine-Henri Jomini was the most celebrated writer on the Napoleonic art of war. Jomini was This is a ~15 page “summary” of the book. Jomini and his Summary of the art of war;. Main Author: Jomini, Antoine Henri, baron de, Related Subjects: Military art and science. Physical. The translators of Jomini’s Summary of the Principles of the Art of War have . Jomini’s Art of War offered a simple, practical guidebook for using troops in.

Author: Daizil Kizuru
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 11 September 2018
Pages: 256
PDF File Size: 8.31 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.95 Mb
ISBN: 869-1-15953-635-2
Downloads: 87310
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mok

Summary of the Art of War | work by Jomini |

As chief of the staff of Ney’s group of corps, he rendered distinguished services before and at the Battle of Bautzenand he was recommended for the rank of general of division. Therefore, until the imperfect sketch of the Seven Years War which Lloyd has given, none of the military writers had come out of the beaten track of official narratives or of panegyrics more or less fatiguing.

Clausewitz excoriated his prescriptive worldview in his writings, and 2. For example, the Napoleonic system that depended primarily on the soldiers’ legs was impracticable in vast countries like Russia, where logistics were lacking.

Inhe was with Tsar Alexander in Summagy, and attempted in vain to save the life of his old commander Ney. I wrote in the course of the yeara volume which I presented, at first, to M. Major General Henry W. It would be necessary to describe the relations or the interests of states like Ancillon, and recount battles like Napoleon or Frederick, to produce a chef-d’oeuvre of this kind.

Summary of the Art of War

Germany was especially fertile in dogmatic works; Xilander in Bavaria, Theobald and Muller of Whrttemberg, Wagner, Decker, Hoyer and Valintini in Prussia, published different books, which presented substantially but the repetition of the maxims of the Arch Duke Charles and mine, with other developments of application. For some years thereafter, Jomini held both a French and a Russian commission, with the consent of both sovereigns.

I have said that I was the first to attempt that demonstration, which others improved ten years after me, without, however, it being yet complete. And if to those you add the multitude of precepts which suffer more or less exceptions, will you not have more dogmas than necessary for fixing your opinions upon all the operations of war? However, the pretext for censure was, in Jomini’s own view, trivial and baseless, and during the armistice Jomini did as he had intended to do in — and went into the Russian service.

I shall be forced to speak a little of myself and my works; I hope I shall be pardoned for it, for it would have been difficult to explain what I think of this theory, and the part which I may have had in it, without saying how I have conceived it myself.


Jomini: The Present Theory of War and Its Utility

He was busily employed up to the end of his life in writing treatises, pamphlets and open letters on subjects of military art and history. In Prussia, General Scharnhorst commenced also to sound those questions with jomlni. A little later came Grimoard, Guibert and Lloyd: Sherman in the Western Theater of the American Civil Warforced them to move beyond his geometric conventions and find other ear solutions to the problems that confronted them.

The books of Montalembert, of Saint-Paul, Bousmard, of Carnot, of Aster, and of Blesson, have caused progress to be made in the art of sieges and of fortification.

Those who would deny this truth would not be candid. Until the fall of Napoleon, politico-military history had had for many centuries but a single remarkable work; that of Frederick the Great, entitled History of my time.

Catalog Record: Jomini and his Summary of the art of war | Hathi Trust Digital Library

In that capacity, he standardized many procedures, and used his position “to experiment with organizational systems and strategies. This book is without contradiction, the most complete that exists on the tactics of battles, and if it falls sometimes into an excess contrary to that of the Prussian general, by prescribing, in doctrines details of execution often impracticable in war, he cannot be denied a truly remarkable merit, and one of the first grades among tacticians.

Jomini’s book had an arguably excessive influence on the U. Graihill inwas edited by J.

Meanwhile, instead of replying to the reproach, and of giving utterance to a single grievance, he has found it more simple to retaliate by injuries, to which a military man will never reply in books, which should have another object than collecting personalities.

Jomini’s ideas were a staple at military academies, the United States Military Academy at West Point being a prominent example; his theories were thought to have affected many officers who later served in the American Civil War. Under these circumstances, I was assured by my own experience, that there was wanting, to my first treatise, a collection of maxims like that which preceded the work of the Arch Duke; which induced me to publish, inthe first sketch of this analytical compendium, adding to it two interesting articles upon the military policy of States.

He died at Passy only a year before the Franco-Prussian War of — There is nothing perfect under the sun!!! However, his narrative of the Seven Years War, of which he finished but two campaigns, was more instructive for me, at least than all he had written dogmatically.

Strategy, particularly, may indeed be regulated by fixed laws resembling those of the positive sciences, but this is not true of war viewed as a whole. Henceforth good books will not be wanting to those who shall wish to study, for at this day we have principles, whereas, they had in the 18th century only methods and systems. Finally, ten years after my first treatise on grand operations, appeared the important work of the Arch Duke Charles, which united the two kinds, didactic and historic; this prince having at first given a small volume of strategic maxims, then four volumes of critical history on the campaigns of andfor developing their practical application.


Thielke and Faesch published in Saxony, the one, fragments upon castramentation, the attack of camps and positions, the other a collection of maxims upon the accessory parts of the operations of war.

For Jomini, Clausewitz’s death thirty-eight years prior to his own came as a piece of rare good fortune. Already had the narratives of Frederick the Great commenced to initiate me in the secret which had caused him to gain the miraculous victory of Leuthen Lissa. Grant and William T. His ideas, as taught by professor Dennis Hart Mahan permeated the Academy and shaped the basic military thinking of its graduates.

Career military staff officer; failed to achieve command; served as an advisor to the Russian Czar; wrote to impress and be published. I resolved then upon this last plan, which appeared moreover, more suitable to all classes of readers. If, out of forty-five articles, some have ten positive maxims, others one or two arh, are not or rules sufficient to form a respectable body of strategic or tactical doctrines?

In all the arts, as in all the situations of life, knowledge and skill are two altogether different things, and if one often succeed through the latter alone, it is never but the union of the two that constitutes a superior man and assures complete success. Jomini is generally seen as Clausewitz’s most influential competitor as a military theorist. All those who love history will still find The Art of War fascinating. I fell back then, upon works of military history tge order to seek, in the combinations of the great captains, a solution which those systems of the writers did not give me.

Meanwhile, in order not to be accused of pedantry, I hasten to avow that, by knowledge, I jimini not mean a vast erudition; it is not the question to know a great deal but to know well; to know especially what relates to the mission appointed us.

Although several of these authors have combatted my chapter on central lines of operations with more subtlety than real success, and others have been, at times, too precise in their calculations, we could not refuse to their writings the testimonials jomin esteem which they merit, for shmmary all contain more or less excellent views.